Good Morning Everyone! What a great weekend, Or maybe great because its over and I get to start a new week. I am the crazy person that LOVES Mondays!
Just a little insight into my wonderful weekend. I ran my first half marathon of the year. WAHOO! It was my first long race since changing my diet so dramatically. I am proud to say I knocked 10 minutes off my time! Thats HUGE for me! I am fully recovered and feeling great already. I was so excited to see my husband and kids waving at me from the sidelines..... in my head I was thinking "man, I hope my husband didn't for get my recovery drink!" He didn't, MY HERO!
(I use Brendan Brazier recovery drink that you can find in his book, "Thrive" I am not sure if I am at liberty to share the recipe here... I'll look in to that!)
I love that our bodies, if properly taken care of, are designed to perform at optimal levels!
SAD: I watched several finishers chug down the new "recovery chocolate milk" (gag) as I searched for water and my husband. I love the bubble that I live in. I was so shocked to see that chocolate milk is now classified as a recovery drink for athletes... say what? When did that happen? Man, they are marketing geniuses!
This got me thinking more and more about dairy because..... as much as I hate to admit it, cheese keeps sneaking back in my life. I did some research and found this letter that may have just cured me! YIKES.
Dr. Kradjian Wrote a letter on the whole dairy topic. I found it posted on several sites. He is a breast cancer surgeon who is passionate about dairy. I took just a few parts from his letter to share: (Read the whole letter)
"WELL, AT LEAST COW'S MILK IS PURE
Or is it? Fifty years ago an average cow produced 2000 pounds of milk per year. Today the top producers give 50,000 pounds! How was this accomplished? Drugs, antibiotics, hormones, forced feeding plans and specialized breeding; that's how.
The latest high-tech onslaught on the poor cow is bovine growth hormone or BGH. (BST) This genetically engineered drug is supposed to stimulate milk production, but, according to Monsanto, the hormone's manufacturer, does not affect the milk or meat. There are three other manufacturers:
Upjohn, Eli Lilly, and American Cyanamid Company. Obviously, there have been no long-term studies on the hormone's effect on the humans drinking the milk. Other countries have banned BGH because of safety concerns. One of the problems with adding molecules to a milk-cow's body is that the molecules usually come out in the milk. I don't know how you feel, but I don't want to experiment with the ingestion of a growth hormone. A related problem is that it causes a marked increase (50 to 79 percent) in mastitis. This, then, requires antibiotic therapy, and the residues of the antibiotics appear in the milk.
It seems that the public is uneasy about this product and in one survey 43 percent felt that growth hormone-treated milk represented a health risk. A vice-president for public policy at Monsanto was opposed to labeling for that reason, and because the labeling would create an "artificial distinction."
The country is awash with milk as it is, we produce more milk than we can consume. Let's not create storage costs and further taxpayer burdens, because the law requires the USDA to buy any surplus of butter, cheese or non-fat dry milk at a support price set by Congress! In fiscal 1991, the USDA spent $757 million on surplus butter, and one billion dollars a year on yearly average for price supports during the 1980s (Consumer Reports, May 1992: 330-332).
DRINK MILK AND DRINK TOXINS
Any lactating mammal excretes toxins through her milk. This includes antibiotics, pesticides, chemicals and hormones. Also, all cow's milk contains blood! The inspectors are simply asked to keep it under certain limits. You may be horrified to learn that the USDA allows milk to contain from one to one and a half million white blood cells per milliliter. (That's only 1/30 of an ounce). If you don't already know this, I'm sorry to tell you that another way to describe white cells where they don't belong would be to call them pus cells. To get to the point, is milk pure or is it a chemical, biological, and bacterial cocktail? Finally, will the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) protect you? The United States General Accounting Office (GAO) tells us that the FDA and the individual states are failing to protect the public from drug residues in milk. Authorities test for only 4 of the 82 drugs in dairy cows.
As you imagine, the Milk Industry Foundation's spokesman claims it's perfectly safe. Jerome Kozak says, "I still think that milk is the safest product we have."
Other, perhaps less biased observers, have found the following: 38% of milk samples in ten cities were contaminated with sulfa drugs or other antibiotics. (This from the Center for Science in the Public Interest and The Wall Street Journal, December 29, 1989). A similar study in Washington, D.C. found a 20 percent contamination rate (Nutrition Action Healthletter, April 1990).
What's going on here? When the FDA tested milk, they found few problems. However, they used very lax standards. When they used the same criteria, the FDA data showed 51 percent of milk samples showed drug traces.
Let's focus in on this because it's so critical to our understanding of the apparent discrepancies. The FDA uses a disk-assay method that can detect only 2 of the 30 or so drugs found in milk. Also, the test detects only at the relatively high level. A more powerful test called the "Charm II test" can detect 40 drugs down to 5 parts per billion.
BON APETIT! THERE'S PUS IN YOUR MILK!
One nasty subject must be discussed. It seems that cows are forever getting infections around the udder that require ointments and antibiotics. An article from France tells us that when a cow receives penicillin, that penicillin appears in the milk for from 4 to 7 milkings. Another study from the University of Nevada, Reno tells of cells in "mastic milk," milk from cows with infected udders. An elaborate analyses of the cell fragments, employing cell cultures, flow sytometric analysis, and a great deal of high tech stuff. Do you know what the conclusion was? If the cow has mastitis, there is pus in the milk. Sorry, it's in the study, all concealed with language such as, "..macrophages containing many vacuoles and phagocytosed particles."